Panpsychism and Pantheism. An Uneasy Alliance?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Although panpsychism and pantheism were seen as natural allies in the past, contemporary philosophy it is widely common to stress differences rather than similarities between them. As a result, only few panpsychists (e.g. so-called cosmopsychists) acknowledge that their view may imply pantheism. In my paper, I argue at least some popular versions of do lead My main argument meets minimal requirements for pantheism, defined world identical all-encompassing Unity this divine. there are kinds allow one avoid these consequences, most pave way pantheism.
 Many philosophers will find serious challenge panpsychism. On other hand, can be argued conclusion not grim seems. An Cosmic Mind has little with God Abrahamic religions, so does necessarily deprive its naturalistic flavor many non-negotiable. Be may, aim paper turn attention proponents yet another problem they need solve.
منابع مشابه
Patents and research--an uneasy alliance.
Critics of the patent system have argued that rather than promoting the progress of science and the useful arts, the patent system as it exists in the United States and perhaps elsewhere may actually inhibit such progress. Much of the criticism has been focused on patenting of research tools. The author attempts to evaluate the extent of this effect, and to suggest some possible modifications t...
متن کاملMicrobiota-immune system interaction: an uneasy alliance.
An estimated 100 trillion microbes colonize human beings, with the majority of organisms residing in the intestines. This microbiota impacts host nutrition, protection, and gut development. Alterations in microbiota composition are associated with susceptibility to various infectious and inflammatory gut diseases. The mucosal surface is not a static barrier that simply prevents microbial invasi...
متن کاملThe uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback
Assessment and feedback can make strange bedfellows. Their goals sometimes lie at cross purposes. Summative assessment, for example, is judgmental, telling us whether or not learners have reached a necessary standard; as Konopasek observes, “when practicing summative assessment, we are acting far more as regulators than educators” [1]. Feedback, on the other hand, is developmental, facilitating...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Roczniki Filozoficzne
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2450-002X', '0035-7685']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf237102.10